PhilSci Archive

Carnap's Response to the Charge that Verificationism is Self-Undermining

Surovell, Jonathan (2013) Carnap's Response to the Charge that Verificationism is Self-Undermining. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Surovell_-_Carnap's_Response_to_the_Charge_that_Verificationism_is_Self-Undermining.pdf

Download (252kB)

Abstract

The classic “self-undermining objection” to the verificationist criterion of meaning states that the criterion does not meet its own standard: since verificationism is not empirically confirmable, analytic, or contradictory, verificationism implies its own meaninglessness. This essay reconstructs and motivates Carnap’s response to this objection. The interpretation presented is contrasted with those of Putnam and Ricketts. I argue that Carnap’s basic move in response to the self-undermining objection is to construe his verificationism as an analytic definition of “meaningfulness” that is meaningful by its own lights. I then discuss possible motivations for this definition. I argue, against Reichenbach, Ayer, and Hempel, that it is not an analysis of the everyday concept of meaning. Instead, I claim, the definition is motivated _pragmatically_: verificationism replaces the ordinary conception of meaning with one that purports to capture all and only the expressions that are pragmatically useful to the scientist. Finally, I consider whether pragmatism faces a self-undermining objection to of its own. I argue that pragmatism is a preference concerning formal languages, and that, since preferences need not apply to themselves, pragmatism is not self- undermining.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Surovell, Jonathanjrs81@pitt.edu
Keywords: Carnap, verificationism, Putnam, principle of tolerance, logical positivism, pragmatism
Subjects: General Issues > Conventionalism
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Values In Science
Depositing User: Jonathan Reid Surovell
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2013 13:06
Last Modified: 14 Mar 2013 13:06
Item ID: 9629
Subjects: General Issues > Conventionalism
General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Values In Science
Date: 14 March 2013
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9629

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item