PhilSci Archive

Analysis and Defense of Sole Singular Causal Claims

Ennis, Robert H (2012) Analysis and Defense of Sole Singular Causal Claims. In: UNSPECIFIED.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img] Microsoft Word

Download (141kB)


To claim that x was the cause of y (or x caused y) is 1) to assume that x was one of a number of things, each of which together with the others was sufficient to have brought about y, and 2) to deem x responsible for the occurrence of y.
A best-explanation argument, including application to cases, is offered in defense of this analysis, which holds that claiming that something is the cause is, in part, a speech act (deeming x to be responsible) that reflects the cause selector’s values or perspectives. No proposed alternative explanation accounts for all the cases with which I am familiar, but this analysis does account for them.
Thus the analysis and the defense of sole singular causal claims call for more than empirical evidence, though of course evidence is very important.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Ennis, Robert
Keywords: the cause, responsibility ascription, speech act, everyday sense, values, perspectives, deeming,target of interference, necessary condition, sufficient condition, causal nexus,independent variable
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
Depositing User: Dr. Robert H Ennis
Date Deposited: 16 Nov 2012 23:00
Last Modified: 18 Dec 2012 18:21
Item ID: 9446
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
Date: 13 November 2012

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item