PhilSci Archive

Scientific Representations as Limiting Cases

Ducheyne, Steffen (2012) Scientific Representations as Limiting Cases. Erkenntnis, 76 (1). pp. 73-89.


Download (155kB)


In this essay, I shall show that the so-called inferential (Suárez 2003 and 2004) and interpretational (Contessa 2007) accounts of scientific representation are respectively unsatisfactory and too weak to account for scientific representation (pars destruens). Along the way, I shall also argue that the pragmatic similarity (Giere 2004 and Giere 2010) and the partial isomorphism (da Costa and French 2003 and French 2003) accounts are unable to single out scientific representation. In the pars construens I spell out a limiting case account which has explanatory surplus vis à vis the approaches which I have previously reviewed. My account offers an adequate treatment of scientific representation, or so I shall try to argue. Central to my account is the notion of a pragmatic limiting case, which will be characterized in due course.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Ducheyne, Steffen
Keywords: scientific representation, idealization, abstraction, scientific models
Subjects: General Issues > Models and Idealization
Depositing User: Steffen Ducheyne
Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2012 23:03
Last Modified: 28 Jan 2012 23:03
Item ID: 9001
Journal or Publication Title: Erkenntnis
Official URL:
Subjects: General Issues > Models and Idealization
Date: 2012
Page Range: pp. 73-89
Volume: 76
Number: 1

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item