PhilSci Archive

General Relativity Needs No Interpretation

Curiel, Erik (2009) General Relativity Needs No Interpretation. In: UNSPECIFIED.


Download (203kB)


I argue that, contrary to the recent claims of physicists and philosophers of physics, general relativity requires no interpretation in any substantive sense of the term. I canvass the common reasons given in favor of the alleged need for an interpretation, including the difficulty in coming to grips with the physical significance of diffeomorphism invariance and of singular structure, and the problems faced in the search for a theory of quantum gravity. I find that none of them shows any defect in our comprehension of general relativity as a physical theory. I conclude by comparing general relativity with quantum mechanics, a theory that manifestly does stand in need of an interpretation in an important sense. Although many aspects of the conceptual structure of general relativity remain poorly understood, it suffers no incoherence in its formulation as a physical theory that only an "interpretation'' could resolve.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Curiel, Erik
Additional Information: Forthcoming in "Philosophy of Science", January, 2009
Keywords: general relativity intepretation quantum gravity diffeomorphic freedom singularities
Subjects: General Issues > Theory/Observation
Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Depositing User: Dr. Erik Curiel
Date Deposited: 21 Apr 2009
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:17
Item ID: 4567
Subjects: General Issues > Theory/Observation
Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Date: January 2009

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item