PhilSci Archive

Regularity Theories Reassessed

Baumgartner, Michael (2006) Regularity Theories Reassessed. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.

Download (161kB)


Until very recently, regularity accounts of causation have virtually vanished from the scene. Problems encountered within other theoretical frameworks have lately induced philosophers working on causation -- as e.g. Hall (2004) or Beebee (2006) -- to direct their attention back to regularity theoretic analyses. In light of the most recent proposals of regularity theories, the essay at hand will therefore reassess the criticism brought forward against regularity accounts since Mackie's famous, yet failed, (1974) attempts at analyzing causation with recourse to regularities among types of events. It will be shown that most of these objections target strikingly over-simplified regularity theoretic sketches, which no present-day regularity theorists would seriously consider worth a second thought. By outlining ways to refute these objections it will be argued that the prevalent conviction as to the overall failure of regularity theories has been hasty -- to say the least.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Baumgartner, Michael
Keywords: Causation, Regularity Theory, Determinism
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Depositing User: Michael Baumgartner
Date Deposited: 12 Aug 2006
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:14
Item ID: 2874
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Date: August 2006

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item