PhilSci Archive

What Makes the Identity of a Scientific Method? A History of the “Structural and Analytical Typology” in the Growth of Evolutionary and Digital Archaeology in Southwestern Europe (1950s–2000s)

Plutniak, Sébastien (2022) What Makes the Identity of a Scientific Method? A History of the “Structural and Analytical Typology” in the Growth of Evolutionary and Digital Archaeology in Southwestern Europe (1950s–2000s). Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 5 (1). p. 10.

[img]
Preview
Text
Plutniak_2022_jpa_author.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (403kB) | Preview

Abstract

Usual narratives among prehistoric archaeologists consider typological approaches as part of a past and outdated episode in the history of research, subsequently replaced by technological, functional, chemical, and cognitive approaches. From a historical and conceptual perspective, this paper addresses several limits of these narratives, which 1) assume a linear, exclusive, and additive conception of scientific change, neglecting the persistence of typological problems, 2) reduce collective developments to personal work (e.g., the "Bordes'" and "Laplace" methods in France), and 3) presuppose the coherence and identity of these "methods" over time. It explores the case of the "Structural and analytical typology" method, developed in France, Spain, and Italy from the 1950s to the 2000s by Georges Laplace and his collaborators for lithic implements. This paper 1) provides a detailed historical account of the evolving content of this collective endeavour over five decades, 2) it addresses the epistemological question of what makes the identity and unity of a scientific method, demonstrating that the core component of the "analytical typology" lies in its particular way to represent real-world phenomena through its notation system, and 3) it reveals how this little-known but significant episode of advances in the methods and theory of archaeology, contemporary but independent of the "New Archaeology" trend in English-speaking archaeology, was instrumental in the continuation of evolutionary perspectives in France and in the development of quantitative and formal methods in archaeology in southwestern Europe, foreseeing crucial knowledge representation issues raised today by digital methods in archaeology and data curation.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Plutniak, Sébastiensebastien.plutniak@posteo.net0000-0002-6674-3806
Keywords: History of archaeology, Lithic typology, Notation system, Digital archaeology, Evolutionary archaeology
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Archaeology
Specific Sciences > Cultural Evolution
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
Depositing User: Dr Sébastien Plutniak
Date Deposited: 03 Sep 2022 19:25
Last Modified: 03 Sep 2022 19:25
Item ID: 21124
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-022-00119-7
DOI or Unique Handle: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-022-00119-7
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Archaeology
Specific Sciences > Cultural Evolution
General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
Date: September 2022
Page Range: p. 10
Volume: 5
Number: 1
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/21124

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item