PhilSci Archive

Replies to Healey’s Comments Regarding van Fraassen’s Positions

Park, Seungbae (2020) Replies to Healey’s Comments Regarding van Fraassen’s Positions. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 9 (1). pp. 38-47.

[img]
Preview
Text
Destructive.pdf

Download (215kB) | Preview

Abstract

Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen’s positions. The four comments concern the issues of whether ‘disbelief’ is appropriate or inappropriate to characterize van Fraassen’s position, what the relationship between a theory and models is for van Fraassen, whether he believes or not that a theory is empirically adequate, and whether destructive empiricism is tenable or not. I reply to those comments in this paper.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Park, Seungbaenature@unist.ac.kr
Keywords: Destructive Empiricism, Disbelief, Empiricism, Models
Depositing User: Dr. Seungbae Park
Date Deposited: 30 Jan 2020 00:23
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2020 00:23
Item ID: 16861
Journal or Publication Title: Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Date: 28 January 2020
Page Range: pp. 38-47
Volume: 9
Number: 1
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16861

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item