PhilSci Archive

Localism vs. Individualism for the Scientific Realism Debate

Park, Seungbae (2019) Localism vs. Individualism for the Scientific Realism Debate.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
Text
LocalIndividual.pdf

Download (363kB) | Preview

Abstract

Localism is the view that the unit of evaluation in the scientific realism debate is a single scientific discipline, sub-discipline, or claim, whereas individualism is the view that the unit of evaluation is a single scientific theory. Localism is compatible, while individualism is not, with a local pessimistic induction and a local selective induction. Asay (2016) presents several arguments to support localism and undercut globalism, according to which the unit of evaluation is the set of all scientific disciplines. I argue that some of his arguments clash with localism as well as with globalism and support individualism, and that individualism goes hand in hand, while localism does not, with the basic rule of how to evaluate an argument.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Park, Seungbae
Keywords: Individualism, Globalism, Collectivism, Localism, Scientific Antirealism, Scientific Realism
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Dr. Seungbae Park
Date Deposited: 03 Feb 2019 14:46
Last Modified: 03 Feb 2019 14:46
Item ID: 15706
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2019
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15706

Available Versions of this Item

  • Localism vs. Individualism for the Scientific Realism Debate. (deposited 03 Feb 2019 14:46) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item