PhilSci Archive

Coherence of Our Best Scientific Theories

Park, Seungbae (2011) Coherence of Our Best Scientific Theories.

[img]
Preview
Text
Coherence.pdf

Download (198kB) | Preview

Abstract

Putnam (1975) infers from the success of a scientific theory to its approximate truth and the reference of its key term. Laudan (1981) objects that some past theories were successful, and yet their key terms did not refer, so they were not even approximately true. Kitcher (1993) replies that the past theories are approximately true because their working posits are true, although their idle posits are false. In contrast, I argue that successful theories which cohere with each other are approximately true, and that their key terms refer. My position is immune to Laudan’s counterexamples to Putnam’s inference and yields a solution to a problem with Kitcher’s position.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Park, Seungbae
Keywords: Coherence, Kitcher, Laudan, Putnam, Success, Scientific Realism
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Dr. Seungbae Park
Date Deposited: 21 Jan 2019 01:04
Last Modified: 21 Jan 2019 01:04
Item ID: 15604
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2011
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15604

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item