PhilSci Archive

Replies

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2018) Replies. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
Text
SYNT-D-17-01020_R1 (1).pdf

Download (875kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book ystematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford UP, 2013).


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Hoyningen-Huene, Paulhoyningen@ww.uni-hannover.de
Keywords: Systematicity theory; demarcation criterion; scientific rationality; continuity thesis; science education; clinical medicine; Socratic scientific realism
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
Depositing User: Dr. Paul Hoyningen-Huene
Date Deposited: 20 Feb 2018 20:30
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2018 20:30
Item ID: 14398
Subjects: General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
Date: 17 February 2018
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/14398

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item