PhilSci Archive

Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics

Crull, Elise (2017) Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
Text
FoP Reply to Critics 10 13 FINAL.pdf

Download (379kB) | Preview

Abstract

A few years ago I published an article titled "Less interpretation and more decoherence in quantum gravity and inflationary cosmology" (Crull, 2015) which generated replies from three pairs of authors: Vassallo and Esfeld (2015), Okon and Sudarsky (2016), and Fortin and Lombardi (forth). Here I respond to criticisms raised by these authors.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Crull, Eliseecrull@ccny.cuny.edu
Additional Information: This article is in press with Foundations of Physics.
Keywords: decoherence, quantum mechanics, entanglement, interpretations of quantum mechanics
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Cosmology
Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics
Depositing User: Dr Elise Crull
Date Deposited: 20 Oct 2017 15:42
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2017 15:42
Item ID: 14042
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Physics > Cosmology
Specific Sciences > Physics > Quantum Mechanics
Date: 19 October 2017
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/14042

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item