PhilSci Archive

Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics

Bermejo-Luque, Lilian (2011) Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 26 (3). pp. 329-343. ISSN 2171-679X

[img]
Preview
PDF
2954-9990-1-PB.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (255kB)

Abstract

I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega’s criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons. Each response is articulated on a main question, i.e., the distinction between regulative and constitutive normativity within Argumentation Theory’s models, the semantic appraisal of argumentation, the concept of justification, the differences between Toulmin’s model and my model of argument and the analysis of the pragmatic dimension of argumentation.

Ofrezco respuestas a lo que considero son los aspectos más destacados de las críticas de John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel y Luis Vega al modelo normativo para la argumentación que he desarrollado en Giving Reasons. Cada respuesta se articula en torno a una cuestión principal, i.e., la distinción entre normatividad constitutiva y regulativa dentro de los modelos de la Teoría de la Argumentación, la evaluación semántica de la argumentación, el concepto de justificación, las diferencias entre el modelo de Toulmin y mi modelo de argumento y el análisis de la dimension pragmática de la argumentación.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Bermejo-Luque, Lilianlilian.bermejoluque@gmail.com
Additional Information: ISSN: 0495-4548 (print)
Keywords: the concept of justification; constitutive and regulative normativity; inference-claims; semantic appraisal; toulmin’s model; warrants; pragmatic dimension of argumentation; el concepto de justificación; normatividad constitutiva y regulativa; afirmaciones inferenciales; evaluación semántica; modelo de toulmin; garantes; dimensión pragmática de la argumentación
Depositing User: Users 15304 not found.
Date Deposited: 04 Feb 2014 23:26
Last Modified: 04 Feb 2014 23:26
Item ID: 10271
Journal or Publication Title: THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
Publisher: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Official URL: http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/vi...
DOI or Unique Handle: https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2954
Date: September 2011
Page Range: pp. 329-343
Volume: 26
Number: 3
ISSN: 2171-679X
URI: https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10271

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item