Zilhão, António (2012) Moore's Problem. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
Microsoft Word
2012_MUGLA_-_MOORE’S_PROBLEM.docx - Draft Version Download (126kB) |
Abstract
Moore’s problem or Moore’s ‘paradox’ arises from the fact that consistent propositions of the form of (1) and (2):
(1) It is raining but I believe it is not raining
(2) It is raining but I don’t believe it is raining
strike us as being contradictory. Shoemaker explained this oddity by producing a proof that belief in such sentences is either inconsistent or self-refuting. For Sorensen many propositional attitudes have scopes smaller than the class of consistent propositions. Inaccessible consistent propositions are ‘blindspots’. Moore-propositions are the blindspots of belief. According to either, Moore-propositions are unbelievable. I argue that Moore-propositions are actually believable.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Criteria of Doxastic Admissibility, Desiderata of Belief Formation, Logical Paradoxes, Rationality | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Thought Experiments | ||||||
| Depositing User: | António Zilhão | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 15 Jul 2012 00:27 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2019 12:32 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 9229 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Thought Experiments | ||||||
| Date: | 14 June 2012 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive-dev.library.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9229 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



